Changes to Alimony Taxability as of January 1, 2019

Stack Of Dollar Banknotes With Judges Or Auctioneers Gavel Or Hammer, Trial Or Tribunal Concept, Auction Concept, Close Up

As many people are aware, when Congress changed the tax laws in 2017, one of the changes was to make alimony no longer taxable to the recipient spouse, and no longer tax deductible to the paying spouse.  This change goes into effect for all new alimony orders as of January 1, 2019.  However, what many people do not realize is that modifications of existing alimony orders, that is alimony orders in place prior to December 31, 2018, can be grandfathered in and remain tax deductible to the paying spouse, and taxable to the receiving spouse.  Indeed, unless the modification of alimony order specifies that the modified alimony order should be governed by the new law such that it is tax neutral, the modification of the pre-2019 alimony order will also be grandfathered in.

In other words, all new alimony orders entered after January 1, 2019, will no longer be tax deductible for the payor spouse.  However, if the order is modifying an existing pre-2019 alimony order, it will remain tax deductible unless specifically.

This can be a helpful tool for negotiating modifications to existing alimony orders as the tax implications have been a relevant consideration in alimony orders up until the changes to the tax law in 2017.  For the spouse paying alimony, the ability to deduct their alimony has often resulted in an ability to pay a larger sum to their former spouse because of the tax savings at year end.  This change to the law removes this consideration from all future alimony negotiations, but it also means that the spouse receiving alimony will be able to count on the full sum of the money received, rather than a reduced amount due to alimony being taxable.

If you have questions about alimony in 2019, or any other issues related to divorce, we are here to help.


Reading the New York Times, I came across this article about States that are passing laws to give guidance to Judges in Family Court regarding family pets in divorce. Nevada has no laws in place dealing with who gets the pets in a divorce, nor am I aware of any currently pending legislation dealing with this issue. As in many States, in Nevada, pets are considered personal property and accordingly, if a divorcing couple were fighting about who gets the pets, the Court would assess their monetary value as part of the overall equal division of community property assets.

As an animal lover, of course I recognize that my pets have value that has nothing to do with the adoption fees I paid the various rescue organizations can i buy finasteride online when I adopted them. Their value to me is entirely emotional, and in no way monetary. Yet, their value as a personal property asset would be the assessed value in divorce court in Nevada.

Ideally, a divorcing couple would recognize that the pets are more spouse’s than the other’s and agree accordingly. However, in divorce, not everyone has the emotional capacity to make such a reasoned agreement. And of course, sometimes people are willing to use pets as emotional leverage to get more of something else they want in a divorce.

It will be interesting to see if this issue gains traction across the country and if more States decide to adopt a “best interest” standard for pets in a divorce.

Estate Planning in the “bubble” of 2011 and 2012

Because we do not know what the future will give us regarding estate taxes, we have to continue to plan for changes that may impact our client’s future, yet unknown, financial situations.  Congress took its time enacting the current estate tax, and it is applicable for a short window of time.  A breakdown of the current estate tax law is as follows:

  1. New and unified estate tax, gift tax and generation-skipping transfer tax exemptions and rates.For 2011 and 2012, the federal estate tax exemption will be $5 million and the estate tax rate for estates valued over this amount will be 35%. The estate tax has also become unified with federal gift and generation-skipping transfer taxes such that the gift tax exemption and generation-skipping transfer tax exemption will be $5 million each and the tax rate for both of these taxes will also be 35%.
  2. Offers “portability” of the federal estate tax exemption between married couples. In 2009 and prior years, married couples could pass on two times the federal estate tax exemption by including “AB Trusts” in their estate plan. The new law eliminates the need for AB Trust planning for federal estate taxes by allowing married couples to add any unused portion of the estate tax exemption of the first buy proscar no prescription spouse to die to the surviving spouse’s estate tax exemption. What this means is a married couples can pass $10 million on to their heirs free from estate taxes with absolutely no additional planning. Be advised, however, the portability was not applied retroactively to January 1, 2010, and as it now stands is only available for deaths that occur during the 2011 and 2012 tax years.

Estate Planning attorneys have no choice but to continue preparing martial “AB Trusts” for the future unknown.  It could be possible for your average middle class family to become subject to an estate tax, depending on what it is.  For example, if the federal estate tax exemption reverts to $1 million per person, many people will be subject to the estate tax.  If an individual owns a home valued in the mid-$200,000 and owns a $1 million term life insurance policy, they will owe estate tax on $200,000.  Life insurance, while normally exempt from tax, is valued to determine the size of the overall estate.  As it stands, we do not know what the exemption amount or tax rate will be after 2013.

For example, here is a recap of the legal changes since 1997:

Estate Planning in the “bubble” of 2011 and 2012


Nothing on this website should be construed as creating an attorney client relationship. Unless and until you sign a written retainer with our office, we will not act as a lawyer on your behalf. There is no guarantee that any information provided by a visitor to this website will be kept confidential. None of the information provided on this website is intended as legal advice to any specific person. All cases are different and even through this website does in some instances provide useful information about legal concept and principles, nothing stated here is intended to provide legal advice to any visitor to this website. No information provided here will prevent us from representing a client whose interests are adverse to yours. We invite you to contact us, and we welcome your calls, letters and emails. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.